Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Equal Employment Opportunity Commisssion v. Loyola University Medical Center
as 1:2011cv04456
Plaintiff:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commisssion
Respondent:
Loyola University Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
ARMSTRONG COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al v. SEBELIUS
as 1:2011cv00565
Plaintiff:
ARMSTRONG COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL , BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL-NORTH MISSISSIPPI, INC. , BAPTIST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loyola University Medical Center v. Dycus
as 1:2011cv00285
Plaintiff:
Loyola University Medical Center
Defendant:
Christina Blodgett Dycus
Counter_defendant:
Loyola University Medical Center
Counter_claimant:
Christina Blodgett Dycus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Chi v. Loyola University Medical Center
as 1:2010cv06292
Plaintiff:
Alexander Chi
Defendant:
Loyola University Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv07420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Loyola University Medical Center
as 1:2009cv04977
Plaintiff:
Loyola University Medical Center and Loyola University Medical Center
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv04385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
