Cases 31 - 40 of 42
WHITFIELD v. THE NEW HOME COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03727
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
THE NEW HOME COMPANY, INC., H. LAWRENCE WEBB, WAYNE J STELMAR and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. NET ELEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03615
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
NET ELEMENT, INC., OLEG FIRER, JON NAJARIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. QTS REALTY TRUST, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03609
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
QTS REALTY TRUST, INC., CHAD WILLIAMS, PHILIP P TRAHANAS and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. MMA CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03365
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
MMA CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC., MICHAEL FALCONE, FREDERICK PUDDESTER and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS et al
as 2:2021cv03206
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
WEINGARTEN REALTY INVESTORS, ANDREW M ALEXANDER, STANFORD J ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. U.S. CONCRETE, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03123
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
U.S. CONCRETE, INC., MICHAEL D LUNDIN, SUSAN M BELL and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. MSG NETWORKS INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02868
Defendant:
HANK J RATNER, JOEL M LITVIN, STEPHEN MILLS and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. KNOLL, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02776
Defendant:
RON KASS, CHRISTOPHER G KENNEDY, ANDREW B COGAN and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. PROOFPOINT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02733
Defendant:
JONATHAN FEIBER, DANA EVAN, KEVIN HARVEY and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02508
Defendant:
LAURA KAISER, BOB FINOCCHIO, MICHAEL KATZ and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
