Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Guishan Inc. et al v. Scooby Scraps, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02684
Plaintiff:
Guishan Inc. and Mister Softee Inc.
Defendant:
Scooby Scraps, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Spabo Ice Cream Corp. et al v. Domingo Ice Cream Corp. et al
as 1:2008cv06138
Plaintiff:
Spabo Ice Cream Corp., Spabo Ice Cream Corp., Mister Softee, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Domingo Ice Cream Corp., Akop Papazian, M Pete Soft Ice Cream and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
MISTER SOFTEE, INC. v. DANNY'S SOFT SERVE CORP. et al
as 3:2008cv03018
Defendant:
MARIA ARAKAKI, CLAUDIA ZAPATA and DANNY'S SOFT SERVE CORP.
Plaintiff:
MISTER SOFTEE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Guishan, Inc. et al v. Faith Ice, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02407
Plaintiff:
Guishan, Inc. and Mister Softee, Inc.
Defendant:
Faith Ice, Inc., Petes Ice Cream Truck Rental Corp., Tommy Dalageorgos and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mister Softee, Inc. v. Susy Menoscal
as 0:2008cv60100
Plaintiff:
Mister Softee, Inc., Mister Softee, Inc. and Mister Softee, Inc.
Defendant:
Susy Menoscal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Spabo Ice Cream Corp. et al v. Rivera et al
as 1:2007cv08628
Plaintiff:
Spabo Ice Cream Corp., Spabo Ice Cream Corp., Mister Softee, Inc. and others
Defendant:
E. Piedad Rivera, Jorge H. Verdugo, Parra Sun, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Guishan, Inc. et al v. Arici et al
as 2:2007cv04074
Plaintiff:
Guishan, Inc. and Mister Softee, Inc.
Defendant:
Sadi Ahmet Arici, Donald Q. Ferguson, Super Softee Express, Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
MISTER SOFTEE, INC. v. ICE QUEEN LLC, THE et al
as 3:2007cv04076
Plaintiff:
MISTER SOFTEE, INC.
Defendant:
ICE QUEEN LLC, THE and LAURA A. ALDERS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
