Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 244
Indiana Treasurer of State v. Andreas et al
as 1:2012cv09363
Plaintiff: Indiana Treasurer of State
Defendant: G. Allen Andreas, III, Morten Arntzen, Alan R. Batkin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
In Re: Parmalat Securities Litigation
as 1:2013cv00418
In_re: Parmalat Securities Litigation
Plaintiff: Capital & Finance Asset Management , Cattolica Partecipazioni S.p.A. , Hermes Focus Asset Management Europe Limited and others
Defendant: Laura J. Sturaitis, Bonlat Financing Corporation, Calisto Tanzi and others
Movant: Ezio Argano
Objector: The McGraw-Hill Companies, SA and The McGraw-Hill Companies, SRL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Paul Otto Koether IRA Rollover v. Arntzen et al
as 1:2012cv09104
Plaintiff: Paul Otto Koether IRA Rollover
Defendant: Morten Arntzen , Myles R. Itkin , Oudi Recanati and others
Movant: Abe Hedaya , Norma Hedaya , William Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
In Re: Parmalat Securities Litigation Featured Case
as 1:2004md01653
Plaintiff: Gerald K. Smith, Ferri Giampolo, Solotrat and others
Defendant: Grant Thornton International, Credit Suisse First Boston, Credit Suisse Group and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Parmalat S.p.A. and Parmalat S.p.A. Parmalat S.p.A.
Interested Party: Parmalat Brasil S/A
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Grant Thornton LLP
Not Classified By Court: The McGraw-Hill Companies, SA and The McGraw-Hill Companies, SRL
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Dianthis S.p.A and Gian Paulo Zini
Petitioner: Ezio Argano
Lead Plaintiff: Capital & Finance Asset Management
In Re: Parmalat Securities Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Freidus v. ING Group N.V.
as 12-4514
Plaintiff: Edward P. Zemprelli, Individually and on behalf of all others simiarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant: Marshall Freidus, Individually and on behalf of all others simiarly situated
Defendant: ABN AMRO Incorporated, A.G. Edwards &Sons, Inc., Wachovia Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee: ING Group N.V., ING Financial Holdings Corporation, Fred S. Hubbell and others
In Re: Fannie Mae Securitie
as 12-3859
Plaintiff: John A. Genovese, Robert M. Rollins, Nicholas Crisafi and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Defendant - Appellee: Stephen B. Ashley, Daniel H. Mudd, Stephen M. Swad and others
Freidus v. ING Group N.V.
as 12-3748
Plaintiff: Marshall Freidus, Individually and on behalf of all others simiarly situated and Edward P. Zemprelli, Individually and on behalf of all others simiarly situated
Movant - Appellant: Joseph Silliman
Defendant - Appellee: ING Group N.V., ING Financial Holdings Corporation, Fred S. Hubbell and others
Zemprelli v. Royal Bank of Scotland Group P
as 12-3642
Plaintiff: Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi, Irving Firemen's Relief and Retirement Fund, Edward P. Zemprelli, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Freeman Group
Defendant: Thomas Fulton Wilson McKillop, Sir, Colin Alexander Mason Buchan, UBS Securities L.L.C. and others
Defendant - Appellee: Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, Frederick Anderson Goodwin, Sir and others
Hong Leong Finance Limited (Singapore) v. Pinnacle Performance Limited et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv06010
Plaintiff: Hong Leong Finance Limited (Singapore)
Defendant: Pinnacle Performance Limited, Morgan Stanley Asia (Singapore) PTE, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Veleron Holding, B.V. v. BNP Paribas SA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv05966
Plaintiff: Veleron Holding, B.V.
Defendant: BNP Paribas SA, BNP Paribas Fund Services UK Limited, BNP Paribas Trust Corporation UK Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?