Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Schroeder v. Kaisha et al
as 2:2013cv06355
Plaintiff:
David Schroeder and Alex White
Defendant:
Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, NYK LINE (NORTH AMERICA INC.), EUKOR CAR CARRIERS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Adame v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha et al
as 2:2013cv06352
Plaintiff:
Esteban Adame
Defendant:
Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, NYK LINE (NORTH AMERICA INC.), WILH WILHELMSEN HOLDING ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
JACKSON v. NYK LINE (NORTH AMERICA) INC. et al
as 2:2013cv04807
Plaintiff:
PENDRELL JACKSON
Defendant:
NYK LINE (NORTH AMERICA) INC., NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA, WILH., WILHELMSEN HOLDING ASA, WILH. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
KNUDSON v. NYK LINE (NORTH AMERICA) INC. et al
as 2:2013cv03485
Plaintiff:
BETHANNE KNUDSON
Defendant:
NYK LINE (NORTH AMERICA) INC. , NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA, WILH. WILHELMSEN HOLDING ASA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
NEW YORK SHIPPING ASSOCIATION, INC. et al v. INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO et al
as 2:2010cv06261
Plaintiff:
NEW YORK SHIPPING ASSOCIATION, INC. , AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD. , A.P. MOELLER - MAERSK A/S and others
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 1, INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 920, INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. v. NYK LINE (NORTH AMERICA), INC.
as 2:2010cv04321
Plaintiff:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Defendant:
NYK LINE (NORTH AMERICA), INC.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702
NYK LINE (NORTH AMERICA INC.) et al v. NEW AMERA TRANSIT, INC.
as 2:2008cv05505
Plaintiff:
NYK LINE (NORTH AMERICA INC.) and NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA
Defendant:
NEW AMERA TRANSIT, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
