Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Ohio Valley Marine Service, Inc. et al v. Granite Group International, Inc
as 5:2012cv00014
Plaintiff:
Ohio Valley Marine Service, Inc. and Branko, Inc
Defendant:
Granite Group International, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Horwedel v. Inland Marine Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00012
Plaintiff:
Michael Horwedel
Defendant:
Inland Marine Service, Inc. and Barge Vessel ING522
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Taylor v. Ohio Valley Marine Service, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv00078
Plaintiff:
Shelby Taylor
Defendant:
Ohio Valley Marine Service, Inc. and M/V Gentry B
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Rose v. Inland Marine Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00071
Plaintiff:
Ralph E. Rose, Jr.
Defendant:
Inland Marine Service, Inc. and The M/V R.W. Naye
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Washam v. Inland Marine Service, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00229
Plaintiff:
Donald Washam
Defendant:
Inland Marine Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Lee v. Muscle Shoals Marine Service, Inc
as 5:2010cv00018
Plaintiff:
Paul Lee
Defendant:
Muscle Shoals Marine Service, Inc
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Waldsachs v. Inland Marine Service, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv00005
Plaintiff:
William H. Waldsachs and William H. Waldsachs
Defendant:
Inland Marine Service, Inc. and CS Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Harris v. Inland Marine Service, Inc.
as 5:2009cv00141
Plaintiff:
Ricky J. Harris and Ricky J. Harris
Defendant:
Inland Marine Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Wooldridge v. Evansville Marine Service, Inc.
as 4:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
James Michael Wooldridge
Defendant:
Evansville Marine Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Nunn v. Inland Marine Service, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv00084
Plaintiff:
Keith Nunn
Defendant:
Inland Marine Service, Inc. and M/V Midland
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
