Cases 31 - 40 of 386
Ortega v. 2&5 Line Deli Grocery, Inc et al
as 1:2022cv09170
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Ortega
Defendant:
2&5 Line Deli Grocery, Inc and Ali Nayin
Ortega v. 20 St. Wholesale Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05501
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Pena Ortega
Defendant:
20 St. Wholesale Inc., Mr. Ibrahim Khalil, Abdelrahman Khalil and others
Doe v. Telemundo Network Group LLC et al
as 1:2022cv07665
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Telemundo Network Group LLC, NBCUniversal Media, LLC, Comcast Holdings Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Olivos Ortega v. El Emperador Elias Restaurant et al
as 1:2022cv05222
Plaintiff:
Mr. Oliverio Olivos Ortega
Defendant:
El Emperador Elias Restaurant and Elias Cespedes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ortega v. Prospect Express Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03122
Defendant:
John Doe, Prospect Express Inc. doing business as Prospect Building Supply and Shawn
Plaintiff:
Demecio Ortega
Ortega v. The Cuban Rest. II LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02822
Plaintiff:
JOSE ORTEGA and Jose Luis Carrillo Ortega
Defendant:
THE CUBAN REST. II LLC and WILLIAM MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ortega v. Between the bun Deli and Cafe Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01813
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ortega
Defendant:
Between the bun Deli and Cafe Inc. doing business as Between the Bun Deli and Cafe II and Sam Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
