Cases 31 - 40 of 64
JONES et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65061
Plaintiff:
ROY VANDO JONES and ELIZABETH R JONES
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv02121
Plaintiff:
WILLIE R. JONES, SR.
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60459
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. JONES and BETTY JEAN JONES
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , H.K. PORTER COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 2:2011cv00727
Plaintiff:
MARCELEAN R. JONES
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JONES et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO. et al
as 2:2010cv81853
Plaintiff:
ALBERTA JONES and CHARLES R. JONES
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON CO. , AMERICAN ASBESTOS CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
as 2:2010cv41207
Plaintiff:
EARNEST R JONES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
JONES et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79106
Plaintiff:
CASSIE R. JONES and VIVIAN S. JONES
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC., GAF CORPORATION, H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv41478
Plaintiff:
LLOYD R. JONES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
JONES v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv75482
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. JONES
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71004
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. JONES
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
