Cases 31 - 40 of 5,546
GROOME v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67472
Plaintiff:
JAMES P. GROOME
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GUTHRIE et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67649
Plaintiff:
QUITA GUTHRIE and DAVID GUTHRIE
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. , H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EPPS v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67512
Plaintiff:
ELOISE CURTIS EPPS
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BEASLEY et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67511
Plaintiff:
GOULDIN F. BEASLEY and MARION BEASLEY
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TROUSDELL et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67479
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. TROUSDELL and VIRGINIA TROUSDELL
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv67651
Plaintiff:
FRANCES V WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. , SOUTHERN TEXTILE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREENE v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67515
Plaintiff:
ERNEST GREENE
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANDERS v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67364
Plaintiff:
JAMES H. SANDERS
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELLIOTT et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67648
Plaintiff:
CLEO M ELLIOTT and THOMAS ELLIOTT
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. , H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ILLICH et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67553
Plaintiff:
LINWOOD ILLICH and ALMA ILLICH
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
