Cases 31 - 40 of 1,054
ERNST et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as 2:2011cv62639
Plaintiff:
ALFRED G. ERNST and YVETTE ERNST
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHAMBERLIN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv63264
Plaintiff:
EUGENE G. CHAMBERLIN and PHYLLIS A. CHAMBERLIN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., INC. , AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. , FIBERBOARD PAPER PRODUCTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURGESS et al v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv62463
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP., JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORP, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
WALTER BURGESS and ANN BURGESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHAPMAN v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES et al
as 2:2011cv62979
Plaintiff:
DORIS . A. CHAPMAN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, BENJAMIN FOSTER CO., EAGLE PICHER INDUS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PORTER v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as PAE/2:11-CV-63297
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
Plaintiff:
PORTER
JAHNE v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as PAE/2:11-CV-63336
Plaintiff:
JAHNE
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
VAUGHN v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv63009
Plaintiff:
GEORGE R. VAUGHN
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. , OWENS-ILLINOIS CORP. , OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BISHOP v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as 2:2011cv63291
Plaintiff:
GEORGE F. BISHOP
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GASPIC et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as 2:2011cv64186
Plaintiff:
JOHN GASPIC and STEPHANIE GASPIC
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., FORTY-EIGHT INSULATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DILLON v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
as 2:2011cv63342
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DILLON
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
