Cases 31 - 40 of 893
ROBERTS v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68112
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERTS
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES , AW CHESTERTON CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CRADDOCK v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68114
Plaintiff:
JOHN CRADDOCK
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AIRCO INC/BOC GROUP THE, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COCHRAN v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68111
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD A COCHRAN
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AIRCO INC/BOC GROUP THE, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUNGE v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68092
Plaintiff:
LEONARD C RUNGE
Defendant:
A C & S INC, AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, A P GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHEPHERD v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68115
Plaintiff:
DAVID L SHEPHERD
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHILLER v. T&N LTD et al
as 2:2010cv67883
Plaintiff:
WINNIFRED SCHILLER
Defendant:
T&N LTD, UNITED STATES GYPSUM COMPANY, UNITED STATES MINERAL PRODUCTS COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67879
Plaintiff:
JAMES YOUNG
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GLOBIG v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67759
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE GLOBIG
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HACKBARTH v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67896
Plaintiff:
YVONNDA M HACKBARTH
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KREJCAREK v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67789
Plaintiff:
MELVIN KREJCAREK
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AP GREEN REFRACTORIES CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
