Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 31 - 40 of 136
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv00504
Plaintiff: THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA doing business as UAB HOSPITAL, THE HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY FOR BAPTIST HEALTH, AN AFFILIATE OF UAB HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER EAST, THE HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY FOR BAPTIST HEALTH, AN AFFILIATE OF UAB HEALTH SYSTEM doing business as BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER SOUTH and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. SDI SECURITY, INC.
as 1:2022cv00410
Plaintiff: SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant: SDI SECURITY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. UPMC MCKEESPORT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00249
Plaintiff: SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant: UPMC MCKEESPORT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
I.A.M. NATIONAL PENSION FUND et al v. RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC.
as 1:2021cv02375
Plaintiff: I.A.M. NATIONAL PENSION FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE I.A.M. NATIONAL PENSION FUND
Defendant: RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. RRE OPERATING, LLC
as 1:2021cv02277
Plaintiff: SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant: RRE OPERATING, LLC doing business as REHAB AT RIVER'S EDGE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. BUCKINGHAM AT NORWOOD CARE & REHABILITATION CENTER LLC
as 1:2021cv02001
Plaintiff: SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant: BUCKINGHAM AT NORWOOD CARE & REHABILITATION CENTER LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. CANTERBURY AT CEDAR GROVE CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER LLC
as 1:2021cv01982
Plaintiff: SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Defendant: THE CANTERBURY AT CEDAR GROVE CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER LLC and CANTERBURY AT CEDAR GROVE CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
WATTS et al v. WATTS et al
as 1:2021cv01595
Defendant: DANIEL SHUE, CHRISTOPHER BARRICK, KRISTOPHER KOELEMAY and others
Plaintiff: LINDSAY LOPEZ and EDWARD ALLAN WATTS
Debtor In Possession: RAGER H. MOORE, II
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. A.D.M.E. INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LTD. et al
as 1:2021cv01581
Defendant: PHILIP ESFORMES, EDEN GARDENS LLC, LA SERENA RETIREMENT LIVING LLC/LA HACIENDA GARDENS/RAINBOW and others
Plaintiff: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND and SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION NATIONAL INDUSTRY PENSION FUND
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451
FLORIO et al v. GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01565
Plaintiff: STEVEN FLORIO, PATRICK COSTELLO, ERNEST WILLMAN and others
Defendant: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY, WP COMPANY LLC, GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?