Cases 31 - 40 of 107
Frank Zanini v. Tim Garrett, et al
as 23-15397
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANK ZANINI
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM GARRETT and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Martin v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv00105
Petitioner:
Vernon Martin
Respondent:
Tim Garrett and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frank Zanini v. Tim Garrett, et al
as 23-15391
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANK ZANINI
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM GARRETT and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Eric Orduna v. Tim Garrett, et al
as 23-15313
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC ORDUNA
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM GARRETT and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Allen v. State of Nevada, et al
as 3:2023cv00076
Petitioner:
Gene Allen
Respondent:
State of Nevada, Tim Garrett and A.G. Aaron Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burdsal v. Davis et al
as 3:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Thomas Burdsal
Defendant:
Scott Davis, Tim Garrett, Kara LeGrand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv00063
Petitioner:
William Shaw
Respondent:
Tim Garrett and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Robert Douglas Peterson
Defendant:
Tim Garrett, Harold Wickham and Brian Williams, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosky v. Gittiere et al
as 3:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
John H. Rosky
Defendant:
W. A. Gittiere, Tim Garrett, K. Widmar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Camacho v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv00001
Petitioner:
Ciro Camacho
Respondent:
Tiim Garrett, Nevada Attorney General and Tim Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
