Cases 31 - 40 of 171
EARLE v. WASHINGTON LAWYERS COMMITEE et al
as 1:2016cv00840
Plaintiff:
VERNON NORMAN EARLE
Defendant:
WASHINGTON LAWYERS COMMITEE, PATRICIA WILSON SMOOT and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BROWN v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2016cv00555
Petitioner:
STACY C. BROWN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and WILLIAM J. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SWEENEY v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2016cv00245
Petitioner:
JOHN SWEENEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MINOR-BEY v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2016cv00087
Petitioner:
EDWARD M. MINOR-BEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JONES v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2016cv00041
Petitioner:
PAUL B. JONES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CARNEGIE v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2016cv00022
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARNEGIE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BRISCOE v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2015cv02085
Petitioner:
MAURICE ANGELO BRISCOE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BOLING v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2015cv01623
Plaintiff:
OLIVER M. BOLING
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, PAMELA POSCH, KATHLEEN A. PINER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HATHAWAY v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2015cv01030
Petitioner:
EUGENE CARL HATHAWAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and EDWARD F. REILLY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
