Cases 31 - 40 of 1,973
MONTOGOMERY, C.D. v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61873
Plaintiff:
MONTOGOMERY, C.D.
Defendant:
AC&S, INC. , THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61441
Plaintiff:
LOYD E. SMITH
Defendant:
AC&S, INC. , THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMILTON et al v. AC&S INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61963
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK A. HAMILTON and EVELYN HAMILTON
Defendant:
AC&S INC. , THE CELOTEX COPRORATION , M.H. DETRICH COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TARVER et al v. A.C.&S., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv62211
Plaintiff:
ALFRED TARVER and LENORA TARVER
Defendant:
A.C.&S., INC. , CELOTEX CORP , EAGLE-PICHER IND., INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORRISON et al v. A C & S, INC et al
as 2:2011cv62109
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR C MORRISON, SR. and AUDREY MORRISON
Defendant:
A C & S, INC , CELOTEX CORP , FIBREBOARD CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GUY v. A C & S, INC et al
as 2:2011cv62312
Plaintiff:
HAROLD T GUY
Defendant:
A C & S, INC , CELOTEX CORP , FIBREBOARD CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AHEART v. A C & S, INC et al
as 2:2011cv62335
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS AHEART
Defendant:
A C & S, INC , CELOTEX CORP , EAGLE-PICHER IND., INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REYNOSO v. A.C. & S., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61890
Plaintiff:
MARIA P. REYNOSO
Defendant:
A.C. & S., INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION , FIBREBOARD CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAIN v. CAIN et al
as 2:2011cv62101
Plaintiff:
EDWARD L CAIN
Defendant:
GLADYS CAIN , A C & S, INC. , CELOTEX CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOPEZ et al v. A C & S, INC et al
as 2:2011cv62310
Plaintiff:
JOHN R LOPEZ and MARIE LOPEZ
Defendant:
A C & S, INC , CELOTEX CORP , FIBREBOARD CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
