Cases 31 - 38 of 38
WILLIAMS v. NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv83978
Plaintiff:
JERRY W. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
NATIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC., AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WILLIAMS v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv72928
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WILLIAMS v. 3M
as 2:2008cv69102
Plaintiff:
NATHAN W. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M and 3M
Cause Of Action: Diversity
WILLIAMS et al v. A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66276
Plaintiff:
ANDY W. WILLIAMS and MARY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RAINES et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66846
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WARREN RAINES, JANEY RAINES, JANEY SUE RAINES and others
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MONROE, JR. v. VAPOR, A BRUNSWICK COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv65517
Plaintiff:
Raymond W. WILLIAM H MONROE, JR.
Defendant:
VAPOR, A BRUNSWICK COMPANY, OWENS CORNING, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WILLIAMS et al v. ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. et al
as 2:2007cv63201
Plaintiff:
AARON W. WILLIAMS and MARIA S. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD., BELL ASBESTOS MINES LTD., CAREY CANADA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WILLIAMS v. OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2007cv60463
Plaintiff:
W W WILLIAMS
Defendant:
OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
