Cases 31 - 40 of 17,798
Janis Lynn Martinez v. Martin O Malley
as 8:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Janis Lynn Martinez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pamelia Bell v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Pamelia Bell
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley and Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Keyonna Jacarie Bateman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02943
Plaintiff:
Keyonna Jacarie Bateman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mathew P. W. v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Mathew P. Wilson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Leandrea L. Sims v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Leandrea L Sims
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rolounda Vernea Robinson v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
Rolounda Vernea Robinson
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rosalyn Unique McGee v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00803
Plaintiff:
Rosalyn Unique McGee
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Agatha Marie Frank v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Agatha Marie Frank
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Shamika Nicole Thirsty v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
SHAMIKA NICOLE THIRSTY
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Timothy Riha v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Timothy Riha
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
