Cases 31 - 40 of 5,248
MCGHEE v. LYKINS
as 3:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
DARRYL D MCGHEE
Respondent:
LINDA LYKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COBURN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
PALMER EDWARD COBURN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCGLAUN v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
JOHN EDWARD MCGLAUN
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
METZLER v. WARDEN
as 4:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
JOSHUA METZLER
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BEAGLES v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
JOHNNY DALTON BEAGLES
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON and ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
POOLE v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
CURTIS WEDO POOLE
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORALES v. DIXON et al
as 3:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
LEONARDO T MORALES
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, LANCE NEFF and ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SANDERS v. WARDEN FRANKLIN CI
as 4:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
TERRY SANDERS
Respondent:
WARDEN FRANKLIN CI and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
INGMIRE v. ROBINSON
as 3:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
CHARLES D INGMIRE, II
Respondent:
COLEMAN L ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUTCHINSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2024cv00015
Petitioner:
JALEN HUTCHINSON and JALEN MICHAEL CHRISTO HUTCHINSON
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
