Cases 31 - 40 of 629
HUFF v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN HUFF
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. SECY DEPT OF CORRECTIONS FACILITY SUPPORT et al
as 4:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE WRIGHT III
Defendant:
SECT DEPT OF CORRECTIONS FACILITY SUPPORT and JAY PAY REPRESENTATIVE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JETT v. SMITH et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
EARNEST JETT and EARNEST JETT, JR
Defendant:
J SMITH, CHRIS FEILDER, RYISNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOBBS v. CITY OF PANAMA CITY BEACH et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
OLANDIS DEAN HOBBS
Defendant:
CITY OF PANAMA CITY BEACH, PANAMA CITY BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILES v. COINBASE INTERNATIONAL
as 4:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW MILES
Defendant:
COINBASE INTERNATIONAL and MY ETHEREUM WALLET CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. YOUNG
as 4:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE WRIGHT, III
Defendant:
YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILES v. DENNY'S CORPORATION
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW MILES
Defendant:
DENNYS CORPORATION and DENNY'S CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. DESANTIS et al
as 5:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
LUIS M RIVERA
Defendant:
RON DESANTIS, COLLETTE PETERS, JACK CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. SOCIAL SECURITY OFFICE
as 3:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
ROGER VON EVANS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOPER v. DIXON et al
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
LEMUEL L COOPER
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON and HEATH HOLLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
