Cases 31 - 40 of 32,088
In Re: Letter Request from Brazil
as 1:2025cv00042
Petitioner:
James T. H. Deaver
Respondent:
Charter Communications, Inc., The Western Union Company, Google LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Cohen v. Matteucci et al
as 1:2025cv00037
Defendant:
Merchants Automotive Group, LLC, Christopher Matteucci and Driverdo, LLC
Plaintiff:
Louise A. Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00036
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Harvey v. Delaware Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2025cv00035
Defendant:
Warden Parker and Delaware Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Kyon Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patent Armory Inc. v. Corkcicle, LLC
as 1:2025cv00026
Defendant:
Corkcicle, LLC
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Patent Armory Inc. v. EmployBridge Holding Company
as 1:2025cv00027
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
EmployBridge Holding Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Patent Armory Inc. v. Esler Companies, LLC
as 1:2025cv00028
Defendant:
Esler Companies, LLC
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Patent Armory Inc. v. Expivia Interaction Marketing Group Inc.
as 1:2025cv00029
Defendant:
Expivia Interaction Marketing Group Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Patent Armory Inc. v. Fullstory, Inc.
as 1:2025cv00030
Defendant:
Fullstory, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
