Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Mellos v. Conrad et al
as 2:2010cv00692
Plaintiff:
Chrisoula Mellos
Defendant:
Byron Conrad, Gabe LaPointe, Mary Kime and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Scarborough v. LaSalle Bank National Association et al
as 2:2010cv00624
Plaintiff:
Chad D. Scarborough
Defendant:
LaSalle Bank National Association , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and First Franklin Financial
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rhodes v. First Franklin Financial et al
as 1:2010cv00093
Plaintiff:
Jon Rhodes
Defendant:
First Franklin Financial and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sabic v. Franklin Covey
as 2:2010cv00343
Plaintiff:
Ermina Sabic
Defendant:
Franklin Covey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hansen et al v. First Franklin
as 2:2010cv00073
Plaintiff:
Mary Deen Hansen and Daniel L. Smith
Defendant:
First Franklin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Overton v. Franklin Covey
as 2:2009cv00846
Plaintiff:
Patrick Overton and Patrick Overton
Defendant:
Franklin Covey
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Wirth et al v. Taylor et al
as 2:2009cv00229
Plaintiff:
Albert Wirth and Florence T. Wirth
Defendant:
Roger E. Taylor, Richard T. Smith, Ascendus Capital Management and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Donnell v. Taylor et al
as 2:2009cv00127
Plaintiff:
Annette Kay Donnell and Annette Kay Donnell
Defendant:
Roger E. Taylor, Richard T. Smith, Smith Holdings and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Engstrum v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2009cv00040
Plaintiff:
Ricky Franklin Engstrum
Defendant:
State of Utah, C. Martell and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Franklin Covey et al v. Palazzo and Press et al
as 2:2008cv00867
Plaintiff:
Franklin Covey, Franklin Covey, Franklin Covey Client Sales and others
Defendant:
Palazzo and Press, Michael Palazzo and Michael Palazzo Productions
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
