Cases 41 - 50 of 55
PENIARANDA et al v. A C S INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as OHN/1:88-CV-04732
Defendant:
A C S INDUSTRIES, INC
Plaintiff:
PENIARANDA
GARDNER v. A C S INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv32722
Plaintiff:
JOHN B. GARDNER and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
A C S INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
GREAT LAKES ENGINEERING WORKS, MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND , MANITOWOC COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MASON v. A C S INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv32696
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G. MASON and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
A C S INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
FOSTER-WHEELER , GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY , H. K. PORTER CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CHATTOM et al v. A C S INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv33127
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
A C S INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MASON v. A C S INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as OHN/1:88-CV-04726
Defendant:
A C S INDUSTRIES, INC
Plaintiff:
MASON
SAUNDERS v. A C S INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2010cv51867
Plaintiff:
RALPH C SAUNDERS
Defendant:
A C S INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MILLER v. A C S INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2010cv41800
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
A C S INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MILLER v. A C S INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2010cv41802
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
A C S INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BARTEL et al v. A C S INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2010cv41804
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A C S INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MILLER v. A C S INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2010cv41803
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
A C S INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
