Cases 41 - 50 of 387
SALAZAR-GARZA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04303
Plaintiff:
JAVIER SALAZAR-GARZA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Salazar v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv11670
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Armando Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Salazar v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Arthur Salazar
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tomato Thyme Corporation v. Felda Vegetable Farms, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Tomato Thyme Corporation
Defendant:
Felda Vegetable Farms, Inc. and Joel Salazar, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 0499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mina-Salazar v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00602
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Mina-Salazar
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SALAZAR v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22803
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SHANE SALAZAR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SALAZAR v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22614
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN SALAZAR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Salazar et al v. Mar Tile Design Corp. et al
as 6:2022cv01678
Plaintiff:
Roneld J. Salazar and Antonio J. Scaramella
Defendant:
Mar Tile Design Corp. and Jose J. Herrera
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
