Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Banks v. Ciolli
as 1:2023cv00891
Petitioner:
Jose Joseph Banks and Geosuff Seven.PointZeroDash-Seven
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rickman v. Ciolli
as 1:2023cv00672
Petitioner:
Kevin Dwain Rickman and Kevin Rickman
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
King v. Ciolli
as 1:2023cv00519
Petitioner:
Eric King
Respondent:
Andrew Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gallegos Castrellon v. Ciolli
as 1:2023cv00327
Petitioner:
Arturo Gallegos Castrellon
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, USA and Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Ciolli
as 1:2022cv03262
Petitioner:
Prince Jones
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mohamed v. English et al
as 1:2022cv03213
Plaintiff:
Khalfan Khamis Mohamed
Defendant:
English, (I) English, Harvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cosby v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2022cv03119
Petitioner:
Gregory D Cosby, Gregory D Cosmo Crosby and Gregory D Crosby
Respondent:
A. Ciolli, AW Programs Complex, CMC Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gowadia v. Ciolli
as 1:2022cv02479
Petitioner:
Noshir Gowadia
Respondent:
Anthony Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Noe v. Ciolli
as 1:2022cv01907
Petitioner:
Peter George Noe
Respondent:
Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Noe v. Ciolli
as 1:2022cv01618
Petitioner:
Peter George Noe
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
