Cases 41 - 50 of 3,729
Hendricks v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Terrie Lee Hendricks
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Toby Edward Williams
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bechel et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03805
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Bechel, Marcia Hickson, Raven El and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Rywelski v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03554
Plaintiff:
Megan Rywelski
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Perez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03744
Plaintiff:
Justina Valerio Perez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carrello v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03543
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Carrello
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Bernell Martin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Estes v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Thomas Brian Estes
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Abbott Hook v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Ian J. Abbott Hook
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Miller v. Onondaga County et al
as 5:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Daishawn-Lavon: Miller doing business as Daishawn Lavon Miller Living Express Trust
Defendant:
Onondaga County, City of Syracuse, Fifth Judicial District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
