Cases 41 - 50 of 340
MANN et al v. MANVILLE CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv92228
Plaintiff:
MAURICE MANN and LORRETTA JOAN MANN
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP., MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST, LINCOLN ELECTRIC CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCQUAY et al v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv92222
Plaintiff:
R.J. MCQUAY, R.J. MCQUAY, BLANCHIE MCQUAY and others
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., RIC-WIL, INC., ASBESTOS CORP., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
STAMBAUGH et al v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv92216
Plaintiff:
RONALD STAMBAUGH and RONALD STAMBAUGH
Defendant:
GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORP., MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, HARBISON-WALKER REFRACTORIES CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Carolyn Rousseau, et al. v. A.w. Chesterton Co., Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-91830
Defendant:
A.w. Chesterton Co., Inc
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Rousseau
Anna L. Johnson, et al. v. A.w. Chesterton Co., Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-91828
Defendant:
A.w. Chesterton Co., Inc
Plaintiff:
Anna L. Johnson
Ruth W. Moore, et al. v. A.w. Chesterton Co., Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-91829
Defendant:
A.w. Chesterton Co., Inc
Plaintiff:
Ruth W. Moore
Dorothy Gann, et al. v. A.w. Chesterton Co., Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-91826
Defendant:
A.w. Chesterton Co., Inc
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Gann
Jean Gann, et al. v. A.w. Chesterton Co., Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-91825
Defendant:
A.w. Chesterton Co., Inc
Plaintiff:
Jean Gann
Norine Jackson, et al. v. A.w. Chesterton Co., Inc., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-91827
Defendant:
A.w. Chesterton Co., Inc
Plaintiff:
Norine Jackson
Leautry Gene Pierce v. A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-83346
Defendant:
A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont, A.c. And S. Inc, A.P. Green Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Leautry Gene Pierce
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
