Cases 41 - 50 of 210
CLAUDIO v. AMERCARGO, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2010cv37819
Plaintiff:
VICTOR A. CLAUDIO
Defendant:
AMERCARGO, INCORPORATED, KEYSTONE TANKSHIP CORPORATION , PANAMA LINES and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
TEXACO, INC.
Thirdparty_defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , GAF CORP , MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BARTEL et al v. ALASKA STEAMSHIP COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv37816
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
ALASKA STEAMSHIP COMPANY , GRACE LINES/PRUDENTIAL LINES, MARINE TRANSPORT LINES, INCORPORATED and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
TEXACO INC, MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND , EAGLE-PICHER IND INC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MILLER v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LIMITED et al
as 2:2010cv37858
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LIMITED , CHARLES KURZ AND COMPANY, INCORPORATED , COLUMBIA STEAMSHIP COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATION, SHOOK AND FLETCHER INSULATION COMPANY, IMD INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
WILLIAMS v. ACADEMY TANKERS, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2010cv37947
Plaintiff:
SYLVESTER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ACADEMY TANKERS, INCORPORATED, AMERICAN TRADING TRANSPORTATION COMPANY , ISBRANDTSEN LINES and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
TEXACO INC
Thirdparty_defendant:
KEENE CORP , AC AND S, INCORPORATED, GAF CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BARTEL et al v. ACADEMY TANKERS, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2010cv37934
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
ACADEMY TANKERS, INCORPORATED, AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN, AMERICAN TRADING AND PRODUCTION CORPORATION and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
TEXACO INC
Thirdparty_defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , EAGLE-PICHER IND INC , AC AND S, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MILLER v. GRACE LINES/PRUDENTIAL LINES et al
as 2:2010cv37936
Defendant:
GRACE LINES/PRUDENTIAL LINES, MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY, INCORPORATED, MOORE MCCORMACK LINES, INCORPORATED and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
TEXACO INC
Thirdparty_defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , KEENE CORP and others
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
COBBS v. APEX MARINE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv37952
Plaintiff:
EUGENE E COBBS
Defendant:
APEX MARINE CORPORATION , DELTA STEAMSHIP LINES, INCORPORATED , EAGLE TERMINAL TANKER CORPORATION and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
TEXACO INC.
Thirdparty_defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , GAF CORP , MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
JOSEPH v. AMOCO SHIPPING COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv37871
Plaintiff:
WILFORD JOSEPH
Defendant:
AMOCO SHIPPING COMPANY , HUDSON WATERWAYS CORPORATION, LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INCORPORATED and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
TEXACO INC and AMOCO SHIPPING COMPANY
Thirdparty_defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER IND INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED , NATIONAL GYPSUM CO and others
Cross_claimant:
AMOCO SHIPPING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BARTEL et al v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LIMITED et al
as 2:2010cv37806
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LIMITED , FARRELL LINES INC , LUCKENBACH INTERNATIONAL CORP. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
TEXACO INC
Thirdparty_defendant:
GAF CORP, KEENE CORP , EAGLE-PICHER IND INC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
DAVIS v. A. L. BURBANK AND COMPANY, LIMITED et al
as 2:2010cv37897
Plaintiff:
HARRY L. DAVIS
Defendant:
A. L. BURBANK AND COMPANY, LIMITED, ALASKA STEAMSHIP COMPANY , AMERICAN FOREIGN S.S. CORPORATION and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
TEXACO INC
Thirdparty_defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND , NATIONAL GYPSUM CO , KEENE CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
