Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Bedard v. Nev. Dept. Corr. et al
as 3:2018cv00218
Defendant:
Kim Adamson, Romeo Aranas, Dr Hanf and others
Plaintiff:
Scott H. Bedard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldanado v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00156
Defendant:
Kim Adamson, Romeo Aranas and Nevada Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Ubaldo U. Maldanado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olsen v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00149
Defendant:
Kim Adamson, Romeo Aranas, Brian and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Henry Olsen, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig Titus v. Romeo Aranas, et al
as 3:2018cv00146
Defendant:
Dr. Kim M. Adamson, Romeo Aranas, Warden Renee Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Titus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Frimmel v. Aranas et al
as 3:2018cv00144
Defendant:
Kim Alan Adamson, Romeo Aranas, Isidro Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Frimmel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno v. Nev. Dept. Corr. et al
as 3:2018cv00137
Defendant:
Kim Adamson, Romeo Aranas and Nev. Dept. Corr.
Plaintiff:
Flavio Moreno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McNamara v. Aranas et al
as 3:2018cv00122
Defendant:
Adamson, Aranas, Dr. Donnelly and others
Plaintiff:
McNamara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beal v. Aranas et al
as 3:2018cv00111
Defendant:
Ken Adamson, Romeo Aranas and James Dzurenda
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Beal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adamson v. Emling et al
as 2:2018cv00426
Plaintiff:
Travontay Adamson
Defendant:
A Emling, Glenn Fowler and Brian Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernhard v. Nev. Dept. Corr. et al
as 3:2018cv00099
Defendant:
Kim Adamson, Romeo Aranas and Nevada Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Zack Bernhard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
