Cases 41 - 50 of 84
APL Co. Pte., Ltd. et al v. Balzac Bros. & Company, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00335
Plaintiff:
APL Co. Pte., Ltd. and American President Lines, Ltd.
Defendant:
Balzac Bros. & Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
APL Co. Pte., Ltd. et al v. California Concepts, Inc.
as 2:2010cv07345
Plaintiff:
APL Co. Pte., Ltd. and American President Lines, Ltd.
Defendant:
California Concepts, Inc.
APL Co. Pte. Ltd. et al v. Pactrans Air & Sea, Inc.
as 2:2010cv07347
Plaintiff:
APL Co. Pte. Ltd. and American President Lines, Ltd.
Defendant:
Pactrans Air & Sea, Inc.
APL Co. Pte., Ltd. et al v. Noble Recycling Inc.
as 2:2010cv07346
Plaintiff:
APL Co. Pte., Ltd. and American President Lines, Ltd.
Defendant:
Noble Recycling Inc.
APL CO. Pte., LTD., et al v. Fleet Global Logistics (U.S.A.), Inc.
as 3:2010cv04403
Plaintiff:
APL CO. Pte., LTD., and American President Lines, LTD.
Defendant:
Fleet Global Logistics (U.S.A.), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
APL CO. Pte., LTD., et al v. Shah
as 3:2010cv04404
Plaintiff:
APL CO. Pte., LTD., and American President Lines, LTD.
Defendant:
Mahesh K. Shah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
APL CO. Pte., LTD., et al v. Shah
as 4:2010cv04404
Plaintiff:
APL CO. Pte., LTD., and American President Lines, LTD.
Defendant:
Mahesh K. Shah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
APL CO. Pte., LTD., et al v. Fleet Global Logistics (U.S.A.), Inc.
as 4:2010cv04403
Plaintiff:
APL CO. Pte., LTD., and American President Lines, LTD.
Defendant:
Fleet Global Logistics (U.S.A.), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
MH Systems, Inc. v. American President Lines, Ltd. et al
as 2:2010cv06173
Defendant:
APL Limited, American President Lines, Ltd. and Does
Plaintiff:
MH Systems, Inc.
American President Lines, Ltd. v. United Presidents Line, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv04745
Plaintiff:
American President Lines, Ltd.
Defendant:
Does and United Presidents Line, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.