Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Dunn et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv00724
Plaintiff:
Martin Dunn and Karen Dunn
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Crane Co. , Blackmer Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Dunn et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 4:2012cv00724
Plaintiff:
Martin Dunn and Karen Dunn
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Crane Co. , Blackmer Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Allen et al v. Flowserve US Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv04495
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen and Carla Allen
Defendant:
Flowserve US Inc., Ingersoll-Rand Company, Flowserve Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Allen et al v. Flowserve US Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv04495
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen and Carla Allen
Defendant:
Flowserve US Inc., Ingersoll-Rand Company, Flowserve Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Bond et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2011cv04199
Plaintiff:
Marisa Bond and Allen Pagan
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Abb, Inc., Gould, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Billy Richard Folston et al v. Alfa Laval, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv06313
Plaintiff:
Billy Richard Folston, Billy Richard Folston, Billy Richard Folston and others
Defendant:
Alfa Laval, Inc., Allis Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust, Anderson Greenwood & Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Type:
Other Statutes
Billy Richard Folston et al v. Alfa Laval, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv05792
Plaintiff:
Billy Richard Folston, Billy Richard Folston, Billy Richard Folston and others
Defendant:
Alfa Laval, Inc., Allis Chalmers Corporation Product Liability Trust, Anderson, Greenwood & Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
