Cases 41 - 50 of 639
National Association of Convenience Stores et al v. Visa U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2005cv04521
Special Master:
James Orenstein
Plaintiff:
National Association of Convenience Stores, National Association of Chain Drug Stores, National Community Pharmacists Association and others
Defendant:
Visa U.S.A., Inc., Visa International Service Association, Mastercard Incorporated and others
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. Public Research Interest Group
Not Classified By Court:
1001 Property Solutions LLC, Temple Eagle Partners LLC, Fiesta Restaurant Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Amcore Bank, N.A., et al v. Bank of America Corporation, et al
as 1:2014cv01757
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Markets Ltd., Portigon AG, Bank of America Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, The Berkshire Bank, Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Vladimir Sklarov
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
BBA Trent Ltd. (F.K.A. BBA LIBOR, Ltd.), NatWest Markets plc (F.K.A. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc), COPERATIEVE RABOBANK UA (F.K.A. COPERATIEVE CENTRALE RAIFFEISEN-BOERENLEENBANK, B.A.) and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 FDIC: Corporate Powers
Xiao et al v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 1:2023cv03287
Plaintiff:
Bai Zhong Xiao and Susan Yang Diao
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A., JOHN DOE and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Dennis et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2016cv06496
Plaintiff:
Dennis, FrontPoint Asian Event Driven Fund, L.P., Sonterra Capital Master Fund, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Australia, BNP Paribas, Australia Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Djavodov et al v. Citibank, N.A.
as 1:2023cv02621
Plaintiff:
Sherzod Djavodov and Gulchekhra Yunusova
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Blackburn v. Feldman et al
as 1:2023cv02380
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Blackburn
Defendant:
Alan Feldman, ABC Legal Services Inc., Cavalry SPV I, LLC As Assignee Of Citibank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Zenith Color Communication Group, Inc. et al v. Citibank, N.A.
as 1:2023cv03587
Plaintiff:
Zenith Color Communication Group, Inc. and New York Digital Color Lithographers & Printers, Inc.
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr Diversity: Notice of Removal
Portugeys et al v. Citibank N.A.
as 1:2023cv02778
Plaintiff:
Bronislava Portugeys and Joseph Portugeys
Defendant:
Citibank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re Foreign Exchange Benchmark Rates Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2013cv07789
Not Classified By Court:
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Keith Kornell, Gregory Galan and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Nasser Bakizada, Robert Charles Class A, L.P., Jeffrey Sterk and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Citibank N.A., Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Credit Suisse Group AP and others
Defendant:
Settling Defendants, Morgan Stanley & Co. International plc, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Donna S. Lucas, Neil Taylor, Doris Sue Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Rives, Robert Miller, Casey Sterk and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
HSBC Bank plc, HSBC Bank USA, N.A., HSBC North America Holdings, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Fresno County Employees Retirement Association
Consolidated Counter Defendant:
BNP Paribas North America, Inc.
Claimant:
FXDirectDealer, LLC (FXDD), Forex Capital Markets, LLC, Lucid Markets LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
