Cases 41 - 50 of 105
KADY v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66605
Plaintiff:
KENNETH KADY
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RUELLE v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66612
Plaintiff:
JAMES RUELLE
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
NYSTROM v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66700
Plaintiff:
ANITA NYSTROM
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., ACANDS, INC., ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
FLECK v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66590
Plaintiff:
ALPHONE FLECK
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LAIS v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66559
Plaintiff:
MYLES LAIS
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HEMPEL v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:1999cv66688
Plaintiff:
PAUL HEMPEL
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTIRES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTIRES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ERICKSON v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66587
Plaintiff:
VERNON ERICKSON
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUDSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUDSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
THOMPSON v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66573
Plaintiff:
GENE THOMPSON
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
POUKKA v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66568
Plaintiff:
RICHARD POUKKA
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MONZELOWSKY v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66609
Plaintiff:
ERASMUS MONZELOWSKY
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
A.H. BENNETT COMPANY and S.O.S. PRODUCTS
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
