Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 41 - 50 of 68
CAHILL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv42078
Plaintiff: EDWARD P CAHILL
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CAHILL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41210
Plaintiff: RICHARD A. CAHILL
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CAHILL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv37388
Plaintiff: RICHARD G. CAHILL
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CAHILL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv56634
Plaintiff: MARC S. CAHILL
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
CAHILL v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv73551
Plaintiff: WILLIAM P. CAHILL
Defendant: FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant: JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAYS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY et al
as 2:2010cv02905
Plaintiff: TYRONE MAYS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and DANIEL CAHILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
CAHILL v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC
as 2:2010cv67495
Plaintiff: MICHAEL CAHILL
Defendant: RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FIRST MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY v. ROSSI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01097
Plaintiff: FIRST MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: KRISTOPHER ROSSI, JOSEPH R. CAHILL, ROBERT N. COYLE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
CAHILL v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31485
Plaintiff: JAMES J. CAHILL
Defendant: SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAHILL v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv00023
Plaintiff: THOMAS A. CAHILL, III and THOMAS A. CAHILL, III
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?