Cases 41 - 46 of 46
TUCKER et al v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON
as 1:2007cv06048
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH TUCKER and CHASITY TUCKER
Defendant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
GAMMA ENTERPRISES, INC. v. MATAWAN REALTY, INC. et al
as 3:2007cv02664
Plaintiff:
GAMMA ENTERPRISES, INC. and MATAWAN REALTY, INC.
Defendant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NUMBER LHO 0508347 v. HOSSAIN
as 1:2007cv01959
Plaintiff:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NUMBER LHO 0508347
Defendant:
BIBI M. HOSSAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON et al v. CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2007cv00053
Petitioner:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET COMPANIES
Respondent:
CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS HEADQUARTERS LLC et al v. MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES INC
as 2:2006cv05120
In Re:
INSURANCE BROKERAGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS HEADQUARTERS LLC, NEW CINGULAR PLAINTIFFS, AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES INC and others
Defendant:
MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC., ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., WURTTEMBERGISCHE VERSICHERUNG A.G. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
WACHTEL, et al v. HEALTH NET, INC.,et al
as 2:2001cv04183
Plaintiff:
ZEV WACHTEL and LINDA WACHTEL
Defendant:
HEALTH NET, INC. , HEALTH NET OF THE NORTHEAST, INC. and HEALTH NET OF NEW JERSEY, INC.
Objector:
Herve Gouraige and CHRISTI WEINSTEIN
Pecial_master:
CATHY FLEMING and PAUL H. ZOUBEK
Intervenor:
RLI Insurance Company , American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company , Executive Risk Specialty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
