Cases 41 - 50 of 63
KENDRICK v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv74928
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD KENDRICK
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HILLS v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv75761
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD HILLS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SINGLETON v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv68705
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD SINGLETON
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GOOD v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv68420
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD GOOD
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HAMMILL v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv68448
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD HAMMILL
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
EDWARDS v. 3M
as 2:2008cv68895
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARDS
Defendant:
3M and 3M
Cause Of Action: Diversity
EDWARDS v. 3M
as 2:2008cv68896
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARDS
Defendant:
3M and 3M
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
EDWARDS v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv65645
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARDS and CHARLES EDWARDS
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RANKIN v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv64411
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD RANKIN and CHARLES EDWARD RANKIN
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HYDE et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO
as 2:2007cv73799
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD HYDE and ARCHIE DAVID ELDRIDGE, SR
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
