Cases 41 - 50 of 614
Rayshawn Demosthene v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 22-11095
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAYSHAWN DEMOSTHENE
Respondent / Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN - USP I WARDEN
George v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2022cv00163
Petitioner:
Romancee Oshay George
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Glasgow v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2022cv00065
Petitioner:
Alvin John Glasgow
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2021cv00628
Petitioner:
Corey Davis
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Demostherie v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2021cv00629
Petitioner:
Rayshawn Demostherie and Rayshawn Demosthene
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Calvin James v. FCC COLEMAN- USP I, et al
as 21-14457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN B. JAMES
Defendant / Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN- USP I and COLEMAN 1 KITCHENS
Calvin James v. USA, et al
as 21-14369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CALVIN B. JAMES
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CLC Coleman Supervisory Attorney and FCC COLEMAN- USP I, Tort Claims Personnel
Dunlap v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2021cv00607
Petitioner:
Jason Dunlap
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv00593
Plaintiff:
Calvin James
Defendant:
United States of America and FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JAMES v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2021cv03086
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. JAMES
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, FCC COLEMAN USP I and FCI JESUP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
