Cases 41 - 50 of 92
WORLEY v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68924
Plaintiff:
JAMES W. WORLEY
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAILY v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69003
Plaintiff:
EILEEN DAILY
Defendant:
A C AND S INC, CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAIR v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69008
Plaintiff:
GEORGE L PAIR
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BECHTOLD v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68993
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BECHTOLD
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PESAVENTO v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69001
Plaintiff:
JAMES D PESAVENTO
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BENNETT v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68968
Plaintiff:
JACK L BENNETT
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLEY v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68997
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L KELLEY, SR
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. A C & S et al
as 2:2010cv68885
Plaintiff:
JAMES D HARRIS
Defendant:
A C & S , ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, A P GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDANIEL v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68923
Plaintiff:
JOHN A MCDANIEL
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD , CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RATLIFF v. AC & S, INC et al
as 2:2010cv68872
Plaintiff:
CHARLES O RATLIFF
Defendant:
AC & S, INC , THE ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY , A W CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
