Cases 41 - 50 of 7,140
MATTHEWS v. AMERICAN MARITIME CREWING
as 2:2011cv55331
Plaintiff:
TYRONE J. MATTHEWS
Defendant:
AMERICAN MARITIME CREWING , AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD., BAY TANKERS INC. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
ACANDS, INC. , ANCHOR PACKING CO. , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LYKIARDOPOL v. FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv58055
Plaintiff:
ARCHIE LYKIARDOPOL
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
PAYNE et al v. FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv55272
Plaintiff:
CULLING F PAYNE , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MONTALBO v. FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv55273
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND J MONTALBO
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ROACH v. FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv57976
Plaintiff:
HAROLD A. ROACH
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JENNINGS et al v. FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv58027
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MOORE v. FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, ET. AL.
as 2:2011cv55307
Plaintiff:
WELDON R. MOORE
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, ET. AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
NEVES v. FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv58086
Plaintiff:
HERBERT A NEVES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
FIESEL v. FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv55309
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM S. FIESEL
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
GRAB v. FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv58095
Plaintiff:
CYRIL GRAB
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
