Cases 41 - 50 of 2,472
PREVATTE v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67590
Plaintiff:
MARY LOUELLA PREVATTE
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITE, SR. et al v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67435
Plaintiff:
OTIS WHITE, SR. and FRANCES M. WHITE
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STERLING v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67356
Plaintiff:
HUBERT L. STERLING, SR.
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROBINSON v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67372
Plaintiff:
GERALDINE D. ROBINSON
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCKENZIE v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67373
Plaintiff:
BURTON H. MCKENZIE
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHILLIPS et al v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv67639
Plaintiff:
RUBY MAE PHILLIPS and VALDOIE PHILLIPS
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP., JOHNS-MANVILLE SALES CORPORATION, RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELLIOTT et al v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67648
Plaintiff:
CLEO M ELLIOTT and THOMAS ELLIOTT
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. , RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC. , H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIBLEY et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv67656
Plaintiff:
JUANITA R. SIBLEY
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, H. K. PORTER COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WORSLEY et al v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv67365
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. WORSLEY and MARGUERITE WORSLEY
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOONE v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67380
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND M. BOONE
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
