Cases 41 - 50 of 69
Petersen et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics
as 2:2013cv00690
Plaintiff:
Nels Petersen and Elaine Petersen
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dahlgren et al v. HowMedica Osteonics Corp.
as 3:2013cv01552
Plaintiff:
Patricia Dahlgren and Norman Dahlgren
Defendant:
HowMedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Schulz v. HowMedica Osteonics Corp.
as 4:2013cv01548
Plaintiff:
Carol Schulz
Defendant:
HowMedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rucker v. HowMedica Osteonics Corp.
as 3:2013cv01559
Plaintiff:
Percy Rucker
Defendant:
HowMedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martin v. HowMedica Osteonics Corp.
as 3:2013cv01558
Plaintiff:
Marie Martin
Defendant:
HowMedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Berg et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
as 3:2013cv01545
Plaintiff:
Terri Berg and Daniel Berg
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis v. HowMedica Osteonics Corp.
as 3:2013cv01556
Plaintiff:
Darris Davis
Defendant:
HowMedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sadowski v. HowMedica Osteonics Corp.
as 3:2013cv01549
Plaintiff:
John Sadowski
Defendant:
HowMedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Chaney et al v. HowMedica Osteonics Corp.
as 3:2013cv01551
Plaintiff:
Anthony Chaney and Lisa Chaney
Defendant:
HowMedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anders et al v. HowMedica Osteonics Corp.
as 3:2013cv01547
Plaintiff:
Michael Anders and Dollie Anders
Defendant:
HowMedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.