Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Diperna v. Icon Health and Fitness, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00136
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Diperna
Defendant:
Icon Health and Fitness, Inc. and Freemotion Fitness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Icon Health and Fitness, Inc. v. Cap Barbell
as 1:2007cv00009
Plaintiff:
Icon Health and Fitness, Inc., Icon Health and Fitness, Inc. and Icon Health and Fitness, Inc.
Defendant:
Cap Barbell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Nivison et al v. Icon Health and Fitness, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00002
Plaintiff:
William H. Nivison, William H. Nivison, William H. Nivison and others
Defendant:
Icon Health and Fitness, Inc., Icon Health and Fitness, Inc., Icon Health and Fitness, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
IN RE ICON HEALTH AND FITNESS
as 06-1573
Appellant:
Icon Health and Fitness, Inc.
Appellee:
Jon W. Dudas, Director, Patent and Trademark Office
ICON HEALTH V NAUTILUS GROUP
as 06-1467
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Icon Health and Fitness, Inc.
Defendant-Appellant:
Nautilus/Schwinn Fitness Group and The Nautilus Group, Inc. (formerly known as Direct Focus, Inc.)
Nautilus/Schwinn Fitness Group:
JUMPSPORT INC V JUMPKING INC
as 05-1182
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
AMWAY CORPORATION (now known as Alticor, Inc.), GLOBAL SPORTS, INC., ICON HEALTH AND FITNESS, INC. and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
JUMPSPORT, INC.
NAUTILUS GROUP V ICON HEALTH
as 04-1181
Defendant-Appellee:
ICON HEALTH AND FITNESS, INC.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
THE NAUTILUS GROUP, INC. (formerly known as Direct Focus, In
NAUTILUS GROUP V ICON HEALTH
as 03-1526
Defendant-Appellant:
ICON HEALTH AND FITNESS, INC.
Plaintiff-Appellee:
THE NAUTILUS GROUP, INC. (formerly known as Direct Focus, InC.)
NAUTILUS GROUP V ICON HEALTH
as 03-1418
Defendant-Appellee:
ICON HEALTH AND FITNESS, INC.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
THE NAUTILUS GROUP, INC. (formerly known as Direct Focus, InC.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
