Cases 41 - 50 of 68,549
Leventman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03271
Plaintiff:
Kathleen W Leventman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Costa v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03272
Plaintiff:
Barry Costa
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Redmon et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03274
Plaintiff:
Robert Redmon and Alanna Shelton
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Costello v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03276
Plaintiff:
Josephine Costello
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davidson v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03277
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Davidson
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holder et al v. Bon Secours Mercy Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Andrew Holder, Amy Todd, Heather Beaufort and others
Defendant:
Bon Secours Mercy Health, Inc. and Roper St. Francis Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Iwasaki v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03287
Plaintiff:
Thomas Iwasaki
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Amaro v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03254
Plaintiff:
Joseph Amaro
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ballantine v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03255
Plaintiff:
Duncan Ballantine
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bateman v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03256
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Bateman
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
