Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Albuerne et al v. 3M Company
as 1:2019cv21554
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Gonzalez, Leiman C. Gonzalez, Christian Garcia and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GONZALEZ et al v. A BETTER, INC. et al
as 0:2019cv60721
Defendant:
A BETTER, INC. and WILLIAM FUSCO
Plaintiff:
JOSE O. ABREU, and JOSE R. GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Camacho v. J & M PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv25084
Plaintiff:
Orlando Camacho
Defendant:
Jose O. Gonzalez, MERCILYN ARAUJO, MERCEDES GONZALEZ and others
GONZALEZ et al v. A BETTER PLUMBING SERVICE INC. et al
as 0:2018cv62615
Defendant:
DAVID WEEKLEY and A BETTER PLUMBING SERVICE INC.
Plaintiff:
JOSE O. ABREU and JOSE R. GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Gonzalez v. Tremont Towing, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv24236
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Manny E. Diaz, Jr. and Tremont Towing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Gonzalez v. MJM Structural Corp., et al
as 1:2018cv23919
Plaintiff:
Bismarck Jose Frech Gonzalez and Grover Munoz
Defendant:
MJM Structural Corp.,, Benay Lew and Henry Lew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peacock v. Ras et al
as 0:2018cv62087
Defendant:
Dariusz Ras, Pedro Cabrera, Jose Pinto-Gonzalez and others
Plaintiff:
William Peacock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez et al v. Agave Metal Trading LLC et al
as 6:2018cv01294
Defendant:
Agave Metal Trading LLC and Manuel A. Keesee
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Gonzalez and Gerardo Horta Ocana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gonzalez et al v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company
as 8:2018cv01214
Plaintiff:
Alicia E. Gonzalez and Jose L. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv23920
Plaintiff:
Jose Carlos Gonzalez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
