Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Smith et al
as 5:2012cv00882
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Shawn Smith and Shawn Smith Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Lewis et al
as 6:2012cv00340
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Wesley O. Lewis and WOL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Eads et al
as 5:2012cv00837
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Matthew Eads and EDAL Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Khan et al
as 5:2012cv00312
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Fazal U Khan, Kimberly D Crumb and Halftime Breakfast & Grill Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Witter et al
as 4:2012cv00044
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Stacey A Witter, Traci G Witter and Time Investments, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Witter et al
as 4:2011cv00705
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Stacey A Witter, Traci G Witter and Time Investments, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Braunagel et al
as 6:2011cv00258
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Caren A. Braunagel , Sam Simon III and Oink, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Kinder et al
as 4:2011cv00450
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
William D Kinder and Jumpin JS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Hurtgam et al
as 5:2011cv00817
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Kellie M Hurtgam and Outer Limits Entertainment LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Reynolds et al
as 6:2011cv00193
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Alexander F. Reynolds, Jr. and Lakota Restaurant Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
