Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Cargill Ferrous International v. M/V TAI KANG HAI et al
as 4:2007cv02615
Plaintiff:
Cargill Ferrous International
Defendant:
M/V Tai Kang Hai and Cosco Bulk Carrier Co LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Dongkuk International, Inc. v. M/V KANG YUAN et al
as 4:2007cv02512
Plaintiff:
Dongkuk International, Inc.
Defendant:
M/V KANG YUAN, Top Smart Shipping Ltd., COSCO H.K. Shipping Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1300 Carriage of Goods by Sea Act
DSL Corporation v. M/V KANG HONG et al
as 4:2007cv02465
Plaintiff:
DSL Corporation
Defendant:
M/V KANG HONG, Pacific Wide Shipping Ltd., COSCO H.K. Shipping Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1300 Carriage of Goods by Sea Act
SB International, Inc. et al v. M/V Kang Shun et al
as 4:2007cv02121
Plaintiff:
SB International, Inc., DSL Corporation, SKC, Inc. and others
Defendant:
M/V Kang Shun, M/V DUBAI JEWEL, M/V Mutsushio and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1300 Carriage of Goods by Sea Act
QT Trading, LP v. M/V Kang Shun et al
as 4:2007cv02030
Plaintiff:
QT Trading, LP
Defendant:
M/V Kang Shun, COSCO (HK) Shipping Co. Ltd. and SM China Co. Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
KingVision Pay Per View, Ltd. v. Kang et al
as 4:2007cv01694
Plaintiff:
KingVision Pay Per View, Ltd.
Defendant:
Soo Kang and Clemente Flores Tovar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0521 Cable Communications Policy Act
Tex-Link Communications, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas et al
as 1:2007cv00040
Plaintiff:
Tex-Link Communications, Inc. and Tex-Link Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
Public Utility Commission of Texas, Public Utility Commission of Texas, Paul Hudson and others
Counter Plaintiff:
Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.
Counter Defendant:
Tex-Link Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 Federal Communications Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
