Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01725
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01542
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00832
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00397
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. CRUZ et al
as 3:2013cv07918
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
JOHN DEREK CRUZ and AMJ SHEET METAL & HVAC, LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. ATRIUM AT PRINCETON, LLC, PAVILLIONS AT FORRESTAL
as 3:2013cv07305
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
ATRIUM AT PRINCETON, LLC, PAVILLIONS AT FORRESTAL
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. VICTORIA HEALTH CARE
as 3:2013cv07306
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
VICTORIA HEALTH CARE CENTER
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
MCCRAY v. UNITE HERE et al
as 1:2013cv06540
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL MCCRAY
Defendant:
UNITE HERE, UNITE HERE GENERAL EXECUTIVE BOARD, UNITE HERE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. ROSDEV HOSPITALITY, SECAUCUS, L.P. et al
as 2:2013cv05745
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
ROSDEV HOSPITALITY, SECAUCUS, L.P. and LA PLAZA SECAUCUS, LLC
Cause Of Action: Administrative Subpoena
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05320
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
