Cases 41 - 50 of 96
Johnson v. Weld County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2017cv02486
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Defendant:
Weld County Sheriff's Office, CorrectCare Soulitions, Micheal J. Roarke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Developers Surety and Indemnity Company v. D.C Byers Company / Ohio, Inc. et al
as 1:2017rj00011
Plaintiff:
Developers Surety and Indemnity Company
Defendant:
D.C. Byers Company/Ohio, Inc. and Neil A. Hillard
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgments
Pollock et al v. MacDonald
as 1:2017cv02137
Plaintiff:
Neil Pollock and Pollock Surgical Clinics Inc.
Defendant:
Greg MacDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blau v. Ells et al
as 1:2017cv01836
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Blau
Defendant:
M Steven Ells, John R. Hartung, Albert S. Baldocchi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. DeCesaro
as 1:2017cv01361
Plaintiff:
Joseph Scott Carter
Defendant:
A. Anthony DeCesaro, Angela Sanchez, Jorja Demartine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lilak v. USA
as 1:2017cv01119
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Safdar Neil Lilak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sattler v. Air Methods Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00824
Plaintiff:
Neil Sattler
Defendant:
Air Methods Corporation , Aaron D. Todd , C. David Kikumoto and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Mata v. Mary Jane's Glass Haberdasher, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00442
Plaintiff:
Neil Mata
Defendant:
Mary Jane's Glass Haberdasher, Inc. and Terry Behrman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SG Interests I, Ltd. et al v. Jewell et al
as 1:2017cv00376
Plaintiff:
SG Interests I, Ltd. and SG Interests VII, Ltd.
Defendant:
Sally Jewell, Michael L Conner, Neil Kornze and others
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181
Lashkari v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03180
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Lashkari
Defendant:
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., Steve Ells, Montgomery F. Moran and others
Interested_party:
Sean Gubricky
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
