Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Lakeview NeuroRehab Center Mid v. Sarah Palin, et al
as 10-35314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAKEVIEW NEUROREHAB CENTER MIDWEST, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
SARAH PALIN, in her official capacity as Governor of Alaska, LARRY LEDOUX, in his official capacity as Commissioner for the Alaska Department of Education and Early Development, ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT and others
Lakeview NeuroRehab Center Midwest, Inc. v. Palin et al
as 3:2009cv00083
Plaintiff:
Lakeview NeuroRehab Center Midwest, Inc., Lakeview NeuroRehab Center Midwest, Inc. and Lakeview NeuroRehab Center Midwest, Inc.
Defendant:
Sarah Palin, Larry Ledoux, The Alaska Department of Education and Early Development and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Lynch et al v North Slope Borough
as 4:2009cv00002
Plaintiff:
Neil Lynch and John Datta
Defendant:
North Slope Borough
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
North Slope Borough, et al v. MMS, et al
as 08-35180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and ALASKA ESKIMO WHALING COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellee:
MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE, RANDALL B LUTHI, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Amicus Curiae:
SHELL OFFSHORE, INC.
North Slope Borough et al v. Minerals Management Service et al
as 3:2007cv00045
Plaintiff:
North Slope Borough and Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission
Defendant:
Minerals Management Service, Rejane Burton, United States Department of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
North Slope Borough et al v Minerals Management Service et al
as 3:2007cv00023
Plaintiff:
North Slope Borough and Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission
Defendant:
Minerals Management Service, Rejane Burton, United States Department of Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
