Cases 41 - 50 of 640
MCINNIS v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69036
Plaintiff:
PAUL MCINNIS
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68890
Plaintiff:
PRINCE J KING
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC , ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68994
Defendant:
A C AND S INC, CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FRANKLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ABERNATHY v. A C & S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68905
Plaintiff:
DENNIS D ABERNATHY
Defendant:
A C & S INC, ANCHOR PACKING CO, THE , CHESTERTON CO, A W and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TILLERY v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68960
Plaintiff:
KENNETH TILLERY
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , C S R LTD, DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOORE v. A. C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2010cv68961
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. MOORE
Defendant:
A. C. AND S., INC. , C S R LTD., CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAY v. A.C. AND S. INC. et al
as 2:2010cv68896
Plaintiff:
HERMAN GRAY, SR.
Defendant:
A.C. AND S. INC. , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC. , ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PLANK et al v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68992
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. PLANK and BARBARA R PLANK
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , BRAND INSULATIONS, CSR LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DANIEL v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68867
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , A W CHESTERTON COMPANY , C S R LTD and others
Plaintiff:
MELTON O DANIEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAASE v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69004
Plaintiff:
CURTIS E HAASE
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
