Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Strong v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02321
Plaintiff: Janice D. Strong
Defendant: Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., Charles Schwab Bank, N.A., PHH Mortgage Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Marks et al v. PHH Mortgage Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv00167
Plaintiff: Jerry Marks and Cheryl Marks
Defendant: PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHH Mortgage Corporation v. Karam
as 1:2011cv01300
Plaintiff: PHH Mortgage Corporation
Defendant: Kerima B. Karam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
PHH Mortgage Corporation v. Emory Alliance Credit Union
as 1:2010cv03364
Plaintiff: PHH Mortgage Corporation
Defendant: Emory Alliance Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burkes v. Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv01332
Plaintiff: Willie Burkes
Defendant: Merrill Lynch Credit Corporation and PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Jordan v. PHH Mortgage Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00967
Plaintiff: Pamela B. Jordan
Defendant: PHH Mortgage Corporation
Brash v. PHH Mortgage Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00146
Plaintiff: David Brash and David Brash
Defendant: PHH Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Type: Contract Plaintiff
United States of America v. An Easement and Right of Way Over 0.21 Acre of Land, More or Less, In Murray County, Georgia et al
as 4:2007cv00137
Plaintiff: United States of America, United States of America and United States of America
Defendant: An Easement and Right of Way Over 0.21 Acre of Land, More or Less, In Murray County, Georgia, Paul Michal, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Actions re: rights of Tennessee Valley Authority

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?